Middlebury or Chicago maybe?
9/20/2007 12:02 AM
Chicago's #3 in his division, so no way he makes #1 nationally.
i'm going to have to say Emory with the #1. Becker at #2.
9/20/2007 12:42 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By mrpolo09 on 9/20/2007
Chicago's #3 in his division, so no way he makes #1 nationally.
i'm going to have to say Emory with the #1. Becker at #2.
Ohhh, a shot to the bow. Bulletin board material for my Chicago squad.
9/20/2007 2:50 AM
had to throw you a bone. its getting boring beating you up all the time.
9/20/2007 10:41 AM
ouch. The truth hurts. Though, I must say, we've got to have the toughest division in D3 Wooden. 3 potential NT title contenders and that's before we even venture out to the North who's got 3 potential NT teams (IMHO anyways). This could finally be the season we send 6 teams to the NT from the upstate.
9/20/2007 11:31 AM
you've got that right. i think this is the best the conference has been
9/20/2007 1:05 PM
My returning guys are pretty ****ed that they are not ranked to begin the season.
9/21/2007 11:29 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By mrpolo09 on 9/20/2007
Chicago's #3 in his division, so no way he makes #1 nationally.
i'm going to have to say Emory with the #1. Becker at #2.
Ha, I was closer than you. I looked at E. Oregon too, I don't see why they're #1, but alright.
9/21/2007 1:04 PM
Well, W CT St lost by 2 to #3 Emory - seems like they always have my number, but laid it to #10 Anderson. Hopefully we will be cracking the top 25 soon.
9/22/2007 10:23 AM
bugs, you are 27th-- hardly a sign of disrespect... but pretty soon I will be out of the poll, and you can have my spot.
9/22/2007 2:07 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By wronoj on 9/22/2007
bugs, you are 27th-- hardly a sign of disrespect... but pretty soon I will be out of the poll, and you can have my spot.
I know, just trying to get my guys fired up. I don't have a particularly difficult NO schedule, so I am sure we will crack it soon.
9/22/2007 5:37 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By wronoj on 9/22/2007
bugs, you are 27th-- hardly a sign of disrespect... but pretty soon I will be out of the poll, and you can have my spot.
But what a team you are going to have when all of those FR are Jr's and Sr's.
9/22/2007 5:38 PM
bugs, it seems like your squads are fairly regularly underranked in Wooden for whatever reason. Works for me though since I've won a ton of money in the books betting on W Conn St, especially once you get into conference play and out of your annual meat grinder OOC schedule.
9/22/2007 8:34 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By taz21 on 9/23/2007
bugs, it seems like your squads are fairly regularly underranked in Wooden for whatever reason. Works for me though since I've won a ton of money in the books betting on W Conn St, especially once you get into conference play and out of your annual meat grinder OOC schedule.
Of all of my teams that are successful (I consider success getting to the NT every year), W CT St is always my anomoly. We always win a ton of games (we do play in a weak conf), including top ranked opponents in the OOC schedule; however, year-in, year-out, we always lose earlier than expected in the tourney. We can never get the run that we should. Maybe that is why they keep us low in the rankings - we are the choke artists in Wooden :)
9/23/2007 3:21 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By palmettobugs on 9/22/2007
Quote: Originally Posted By wronoj on 9/22/2007
bugs, you are 27th-- hardly a sign of disrespect... but pretty soon I will be out of the poll, and you can have my spot.
But what a team you are going to have when all of those FR are Jr's and Sr's.
let's hope it does better than the one that just by losing in the 2nd round...
9/23/2007 7:30 AM
◂ Prev 1...10|11|12|13|14...76 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.