I would like to see the Conference Chat back under the Conference Standings. Anyone else agree?

Also, I would love to see a World Chat link in the office settings similar to FC Dynasty. Is this possible?

I'd like to see the Childhood Favorite return if at all possible. Always liked that feature. Maybe those players could contact us and be discovered. Perhaps they could send a tape, and we'd be at level 1 automatically and start out at moderate interest, and have a slight edge in recruiting. Perhaps each D1 school could have at least one player like them. Perhaps some kids could have a couple of favorites.

Posted by chapelhillne on 6/18/2016 7:10:00 AM (view original):
I have a suggestion for the regional camps. I know it's kind of a cool feature to have them staggered at different dates, but what would be wrong with being able to go ahead and go to the camps immediately. For me, my goal is to get the information I need for scouting as soon as possible. Right now I have time, and wanted to try to pick out my recruiting targets. But, I want to go to the NY camp, so I can't finish my scouting yet. I still like the idea of the regional camps a lot, but do we really need to put a date on them? Why could people not go to them whenever they want, within a certain time frame? If I could go to those camps tonight, I would have all of my scouting done tonight.

Agreed!

It would be nice to look back at the past seasons class rankings for player signings. I know it is more window dressing than anything else, but it could give us some context into how certain players developed and if their growth held true to the ranking of that team.

Seble, the play by play should hide ranking because sometimes the result of the PBP is predictable when you see a team's ranking which has adjusted after the game has simmed.

I've always wanted this in the current game but when looking at another team's ratings it would be nice if there was an option to exclude walk-ons from those ratings so you can see the average team ratings just for the guys that you will actually play against.

How about "signing preference" in the recruit search function?

Here is my proposal after playing Fc soccer. For new players its a huge bonus to have subbing reccomendetions like fc soccer. Instead of having to fill out your own depth chart. Let the game engine decide the subs and what is best for the team.

Posted by CoachWard95 on 6/23/2016 6:08:00 PM (view original):
Here is my proposal after playing Fc soccer. For new players its a huge bonus to have subbing reccomendetions like fc soccer. Instead of having to fill out your own depth chart. Let the game engine decide the subs and what is best for the team.

No offense Coachward, truly, but this is an awful idea. We want to have MORE control, not less.

i'm pretty sure that is what the optimize button does

Posted by skinzfan36 on 6/23/2016 8:34:00 PM (view original):
i'm pretty sure that is what the optimize button does

The optimize button does that already?

Two pieces I'm missing when recruiting. (1) Broader competitive info. Meaning - if I want to look at who Harvard is recruiting it was previously on their school page under recruiting. Now it appears only reserved for signed players. I would love to see a full list of players that school is involved with and at what level. And the distance info was notable as well. Distance is less of a factor here in the update but still noteworthy to have. (2) Are we not able to filter out players by traits? I LOVE being able to sort by key preference (signing time, distance, etc.) but I miss being able to search my scouting list based on filters - i.e. minimum ATH, SP, Def, BH, Pass thresholds for a PG. Otherwise it's difficult to narrow down in this way which was much easier.

***Need to allow Schollys when kid is considering. No Brainer. Bad logic to not have that. He wouldn't consider if he's not ready to accept offer. Again whether he accepts is a different story or how high he lists your school, but to not be able to offer? Bad logic.

Along same lines if he considers you he should be able to accept a HV or CV. Make it harder to consider, but unlock HV CV and especially schollies once considering.

Need to have first page of targets default to ALL CONTACTED--NOT CATEGORIZED

Put Projected level under kids name a little larger than current font--right above ht and weight but larger than height and weight but smaller than his name

Need to have a gridlike system to move APs around like a practice plan grid for recruits. Don't like going to each one individually.

Need default page on recruiting to come up with all recruits not a blank screen. Or at least have each user identify what they'd like as a default page

Need to have the color codes {Potential is indicated by colors: Very Low, Low, Average, High, Very High} listed each time the dark colored bar breaks up the list of kids.

Would like to be able to search DII and DIII recruits without DI or DI and DII without DIII....

Would like to be able to ID all uncovered that aren't in the Top 100.

Site is very slow moving from page to page

Did I say unlock schollies offered?

And HV CV once considering?

Allow us to move kids to targets along side of moving kids to compare. As it is now, if I see a kid I like but don't have APoints, I have to go back and remove some points, then re-search for the kid. Gotta be easier.

Let us remove kids from the compare list one by one.

Allow us to add to the compare list from the target page

Posted by aidiamo on 6/24/2016 11:57:00 AM (view original):
Two pieces I'm missing when recruiting. (1) Broader competitive info. Meaning - if I want to look at who Harvard is recruiting it was previously on their school page under recruiting. Now it appears only reserved for signed players. I would love to see a full list of players that school is involved with and at what level. And the distance info was notable as well. Distance is less of a factor here in the update but still noteworthy to have. (2) Are we not able to filter out players by traits? I LOVE being able to sort by key preference (signing time, distance, etc.) but I miss being able to search my scouting list based on filters - i.e. minimum ATH, SP, Def, BH, Pass thresholds for a PG. Otherwise it's difficult to narrow down in this way which was much easier.

The risk there is that if you haven't uncovered that player you'll be tipped off. Maybe allow that info only if you've uncovered that player?

Posted by skinzfan36 on 6/21/2016 6:44:00 PM (view original):
I've always wanted this in the current game but when looking at another team's ratings it would be nice if there was an option to exclude walk-ons from those ratings so you can see the average team ratings just for the guys that you will actually play against.

Yes. Walk ons should be excluded on averages as well as team average ratings pages.